|
Vivienne
Matalon, MD, Moderator,
David Heber, MD, PhD;
John W.C. Johnson, MD;
Frank Kane,
MD;
John Foreyt, PhD
Forum
on
Obesity
Clinician
Intervention
Matalon:
Obesity is among the most serious health problems in the United
States, second only to cigarette smoking. Data from the US Department
of Health now classifies 97 million Americans as having a weight
problem; 58 million of these persons are obese.' Research has also
shown that women are more affected by weight problems than men.'
Clinicians providing health care to women should be aware that 55%
of the obese population is female.' The reason for this may be physiological,
because women have a higher percentage of essential body fat (about
12%) than men.
Obesity has been identified as a risk factor in more than 30 illnesses,
including cardiovascular disease, gallstone formation, diabetes,
osteoarthritis, gastrointestinal disorders, breast inflammation,
sleep apnea, and even malignancy.' Our discussion today will focus
on this widespread disease entity.
Heber:
Indeed, we are currently in the midst of an obesity epidemic. I
have been treating
obese
patients for more than 20 years, over 80% of whom have been women.
The reasons why obesity is much more prevalent among women than
men involve physiological, psychological, and cultural considerations.
Physiologically speaking, body fat is a secondary sex characteristic
in women-that is, the deposition of fat around the hips and thighs
during puberty is a part of normal development in adolescent girls.
For many women, accumulation of fat occurs with postpregnancy weight
gain, and the location of fat deposits shifts during the life cycle.
After menopause, women often accumulate upper-body fat, which increase
their risk for several chronic diseases, such as heart disease,
hypertension, diabetes, and some cancers
 |
| I
suggest that patients being treated for obesity keep a diary
of food, physical activity, and their feelings. |
(including
breast cancer).' Also, muscle mass decreases after menopause because
of loss of estrogen. As for the psychological component, much has
been written about the impact of excess body fat on selfimage and
emotional well-being in women. As physicians, we need to develop
the skills that will allow us to address these important issues.
Matalon:
Which aspect
plays a greater role in obesity, psychology or physiology?
Heber: It is difficult to separate the
two. Nutrition involves both behavior and physiology. Food intake
obviously has a behavioral side, whereas food itself has a biochemical
element. Therefore, the reasons for eating, which are often emotional,
as well as food compositions-percentages of fat, carbohydrate, and
protein-a contribute to obesity
Foreyt:
The psychological aspect of obesity is often overlooked, yet its
costs can be devastating. We know that as weight increases, self-esteem
is often affected negatively. To treat obesity, we must treat the
psychological aspect concomitantly with the physiological.
Heber: From a motivational standpoint, health
enhancement is a more successful approach than illness prevention
in motivating patients to change their behavior patterns.
Heber: It is clearly psychosocial. On average,
Americans are eating 200 more calories per day than they did just
10 years ago. The reasons include portion sizes, fast food, and
lack of physical activity and exercise. From the psychosocial point
of view, some people work hard, then they come home and use food
to relieve their stress.
Matalon:
I agree with Dr Heber about the correlation between fast food
and obesity, even between feeding patterns in children and obesity.
The first solid food often given to infants is rice cereal, a starch.
This type of high- carbohydrate diet prevails throughout infancy,
childhood, and adulthood.
Dr Heber, you mentioned diabetes earlier; diabetes and hyperlipidemia
have been linked. Could you elaborate on this?
Heber: These commonly occurring diseases are
frequently seen in obese patients. Metabolic syndromes such as hyperinsulinemia,
hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and glucose intolerance often occur
along with abdominal obesity, challenging the paradigm of care for
the primary care physician. In cases such as hypertension, heart
disease, and diabetes, we have all been taught to triage to different
specialties. However, the focus in treating type 2 diabetes, which
affects 30 million Americans, should be on weight control and weight
management. hi many patients, hypertension can also be controlled
by losing about 10% of body weight. The recent guidelines that were
set by the American Heart Association suggest
that the primary approach to hypertension and hyperlipidemia should
be changes in diet and lifestyle. This, however, is not common in
clinical practice.
Foreyt: Many physicians never even mention
the patient's obesity; instead, they focus on the other health issues
and neglect the very one that is the cause. We also need to emphasize
that patients do not have to lose 100 lb to benefit their health;
as little as 10 to 20 lb is often beneficial.
Kane:
Many of my patients, predominantly the postmenopausal women, are
frustrated because they cannot lose weight-despite their efforts,
which are not just for cosmetic reasons. The American Academy of
Family Physicians has recently passed a resolution urging insurance
companies to classify obesity as a medical illness. As primary care
physicians, we have to consider obesity as more than just a triage.
We must treat the patient as a whole; weight is often the central
problem causing the other medical conditions. At present, two things
limit our ability to treat obesity effectively-lack of proper training,
and time constraints. Managed care has put a tremendous burden on
the practicing physician in terms of patient care; nutritional counseling,
which is extremely important, requires more time than we currently
have.
Heber:
The good news is that meal replacements and portion-controlled meals
currently enable patients to embrace those diet and lifestyle changes
that actually work. We also understand, more than ever before, the
physiology of exercise and the role of regular activity in weight
maintenance. In addition, two new drugs have been approved by the
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for weight loss- sibutramine
(Meridia') and orlistat (Xenicall). With all of these treatment
options, it is up to us, physicians, to recommend them to our patients.
Matalon: Indeed, even as little as a 5%
weight loss can make a difference, by reducing the patient's diabetic,
hypertensive, or thromboembolic profile.
Foreyt: And let's not forget the psychosocial
profile.
Heber: Thousands of patients have been prescribed
either a satiety agent (e.g., sibutramine) or a lipase inhibitor
(e.g., orlistat) and have experienced significant weight loss. In
a study we, performed at our center, we combined meal replacements
with a satiety agent and got significant weight losses-up to 35
lb in 24 weeks This was also accompanied by a major amelioration
of secondary risks.
Matalon: We are seeing a growing number
of medical consequences associated with obesity. How do we treat
obese patients with comorbid conditions such as gallbladder disease,
sleep apnea, or respiratory conditions?
Kane: Obese patients are at greater risk
for cholelithiasis because when people 'go on a diet, 'their gallbladder
contracts less, which in turn causes stone formation in the bile.
We currently have effective prophylactic treatments that prevent
both formation of gallstones and the need for surgery.
Matalon: What about
sleep apnea?
Heber:
We frequently find ourselves in a vicious circle with obese patients
who have symptoms of sleep apnea. Patients often overeat to keep
themselves awake during the day after a sleepless night. If we do
not identify the sleep apnea and treat it appropriately, it becomes
very difficult to manage the obese patient.
Matalon: Sleep apnea has
been shown to
be associated with
a interruption to rapid- eye -
movement (REM)
sleep; this contributes
to a deficiency
in REM sleep, which
results in daytime
fatigue. Has that
been your experience
too?
Kane: Indeed, this is the "catch-22" problem
we face. We ask the patient to exercise, but she is too fatigued.
Heber: When advising on exercise or nutritional
changes, it is important to adhere to whatever is practical. First,
I try to get the patient to walk, and then I initiate some aerobic
activities. Anybody can walk, or maybe garden; patients can take
on simple physical activities in their leisure time.
Matalon: Obesity hyperventilation syndrome
also plays a role in patients with low oxygen- carrying capacity,
shortness of breath, fatigue, andlor noncardiac chest pain. Promyelocytic
leukemia has also been linked to obesity. What do we know about
malignancy in patients with obesity?
Heber: The American Cancer Society has
studied over 750,000 persons and found that obesity is a risk factor
for many kinds of cancers, including that of the breast, prostate,
colon, kidney, ovaries, uterus, and gallbladder.' The culprits are
not only excess fat or
calories, but also the absence of fruits and vegetables- important
phytonutrients and fiber-from the diet, and the lack of exercise.
Therefore, when we talk about obesity, we are really talking about
the entire picture of the patient who is concomitantly overnourished
and malnourished.
Matalon:
What can we add about clinical depression in this context, Dr Kane?
Kane: The obese patient who tends to be
depressed turns to food for comfort. Such a person does not have
strong self-esteem. This is why obesity and clinical depression
often coexist; however, the question of what came first is often
very difficult to answer.
Johnson: Many of my obese patients are depressed,
and this interferes with their compliance to some extent. They lack
the enthusiasm to get into any weight- reduction program.
Matalon: In conclusion, we can clearly
say that obesity management has finally come to the forefront of
medicine. The etiology of this condition is both genetic and acquired
through a variety of coexisting metabolic conditions and physiologic,
psychosocial, and socioeconomic changes. Understanding the morphology
of this illness is essential to selecting a safe, physiologically
based treatment protocol. As our panelists have poignantly illustrated,
respect for this condition as a medical entity begins with the education
of the treating physician
|